S2014 Q20

I have a few questions from this example:
1. The first table says everything is in thousands, so doesn't the final R3 charge come out to 1,116,000? Because it's 1116*1000?
2. Are we expected to calculate the inequality to determine if the Reins Recoverables charge should be split between R3 and R4? This inequality isn't mentioned in the examiner's report.
3. Are we expected to assume aff domestic insurers are subject to RBC requirements? If so, when would an affiliate insurer be included in R2 and not R0?

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.