Dearie v NAIC.Solvency
In the NAIC.Solvency wiki page it states that: "In very general terms, NRRA gives an insurer's home state exclusive authority to regulate the placement of nonadmitted insurance."
In Dearie, the wiki page states that the NRRA "limits regulatory authority of surplus lines to an insured's home state."
Will the insurer's home state and insured's home state always be one in the same when it comes to surplus lines? Or more simply put, are these 2 statements contradictory?