Difference between revisions of "Bright Line Indicator Test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: <span style="color: red;'>'''[2]'''</span> 10% x (net L & LAE) > TAC – CAL | ::: <span style="color: red;'>'''[2]'''</span> 10% x (net L & LAE) > TAC – CAL | ||
:: THEN | :: THEN | ||
| − | ::: financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA | + | ::: the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA |
'''Example''': | '''Example''': | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 7 September 2019
The Bright Line Indicator Test is discussed in COPLFR.SAO as part of the SAO but it requires knowledge Odomirok.19-RBC, specifically Alice's 1st Day. That section will only take a few minutes to read so you should do that before proceeding.
Question: what is the bright line indicator test
- IF
- [1] the AA does not address material adverse deviation
- [2] 10% x (net L & LAE) > TAC – CAL
- THEN
- the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA
- IF
Example:
- Suppose the AA did not address material adverse deviation and that:
- net L & LAE = 500
- TAC = 600
- ACL = 280
- Then:
- 10% x (net L & LAE) = 10% x 500 = 50 > 40 = (600 – 560) = (TAC – CAL) = (TAC – 2 x ACL)
- Therefore, the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA regarding material adverse deviation.
Here are 2 old exam problems regarding the Bright Line Indicator Test:
