Difference between revisions of "Bright Line Indicator Test"

From BattleActs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Bright Line Indicator Test''' is discussed in ''[[COPLFR.SAO]]'' as part of the SAO but it requires knowledge from the RBC chapter in Odomirok, ''[[Odomirok.19-RBC#Alice.27s_1st_Day_.28Intro_to_RBC.29 | Alice's 1st Day]]''. That section will only take a few minutes to read so you should do that before proceeding.
+
The '''Bright Line Indicator Test''' is discussed in ''[[COPLFR.SAO]]'' as part of the SAO but it requires knowledge [[Odomirok.19-RBC]], specifically ''[[Odomirok.19-RBC#Alice.27s_1st_Day_.28Intro_to_RBC.29 | Alice's 1st Day]]''. That section will only take a few minutes to read so you should do that before proceeding.
  
 
:{| class='wikitable'
 
:{| class='wikitable'

Revision as of 14:11, 7 September 2019

The Bright Line Indicator Test is discussed in COPLFR.SAO as part of the SAO but it requires knowledge Odomirok.19-RBC, specifically Alice's 1st Day. That section will only take a few minutes to read so you should do that before proceeding.

Question: what is the bright line indicator test
IF
[1] the AA does not address material adverse deviation
[2] 10% x (net L & LAE)   >   TAC – CAL
THEN
financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA

Example:

Suppose the AA did not address material adverse deviation and that:
net L & LAE = 500
TAC = 600
ACL = 280
Then:
10% x (net L & LAE) = 10% x 500 = 50   >   40 = (600 – 560) = (TAC – CAL) = (TAC – 2 x ACL)
Therefore, the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA regarding material adverse deviation.

Here are 2 old exam problems regarding the Bright Line Indicator Test:

E (2019.Spring #19)
E (2016.Fall #20)