Difference between revisions of "RBC for Holding Companies"

From BattleActs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
 
|}
 
|}
  
: First calculate CV(subs) by summing across the 2 given subsidiaries:
+
:: Calculate CV(subs) by summing across the 2 given subsidiaries:
  
: '''CV(subs)''' = [ 600 x 80% x 20% ] + [ 600 x 80% x 60% ] = <u>384</u>
+
::: '''CV(subs)''' = [ 600 x 80% x 20% ] + [ 600 x 80% x 60% ] = <u>384</u>
  
The final answer is:
+
: The final answer is:
  
'''R<sub>1</sub> charge for holding company''' = 0.225 x 600 &ndash; 384 = <u>48.6</u>
+
:: '''R<sub>1</sub> charge for holding company''' = 0.225 x 600 &ndash; 384 = <u>48.6</u>

Revision as of 14:04, 8 September 2019

This is an example of how to calculate the R1 and R2 charges when the insurer owns shares in a holding company. Note: The calculation is essentially the same for R1 and R2. The only difference is that you use only fixed income assets for R1 and only equity assets for R2.

Given:

Here we calculate the R1 charge for holding companies because the table below only provides information about fixed income assets.

  • market(HC) = 600 (market value of holding company HC)
  • ownership % = 80% (insurer has 80% ownership in the holding company)
type of asset book value of asset
(fixed income)
distribution
subsidiary 1 100 20%
subsidiary 2 300 60%
cash 50 10%
other assets 50 10%

Solution:

We just need a couple of simple formulas. Let CV(subs) = carrying value of subsidiaries

R1 charge for holding company = 0.225 x market(HC) – CV(subs)
where 0.225 is the RBC factor and
CV(subs) = Σi [ (market(HC) x (ownership %) x (distribution)i ]
Calculate CV(subs) by summing across the 2 given subsidiaries:
CV(subs) = [ 600 x 80% x 20% ] + [ 600 x 80% x 60% ] = 384
The final answer is:
R1 charge for holding company = 0.225 x 600 – 384 = 48.6