Difference between revisions of "NAIC.Price"

From BattleActs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(BattleCodes)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
This reading, ''Price Optimization White Paper'', provides background research on price optimization, identifies potential <u>benefits and drawbacks</u> to the use of price optimization, and presents options for state <u>regulatory responses</u> regarding the use of price optimization in ratemaking.
 +
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/vanillaforum6us/categories/naic-price<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>]
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/vanillaforum6us/categories/naic-price<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>]
  
==Pop Quiz==
+
==Study Tips==
  
 +
Since this is a relatively new reading, we don't have a lot of old exam problems to help us determine what the CAS deems important. Unfortunately, that means we'll have to spend more time on this reading, possibly learning things that are of relatively little importance, but we'll use judgment to try to minimize wasted time. As more exam problems on the topic appear, we'll be able to cull the material that needs to be studied. I'd plan for 2 hours on this reading ''(not including subsequent review time.)''
  
 
==BattleTable==
 
==BattleTable==
Line 8: Line 11:
 
Based on past exams, the '''main things''' you need to know ''(in rough order of importance)'' are:
 
Based on past exams, the '''main things''' you need to know ''(in rough order of importance)'' are:
  
*
+
* <span style="color: green;">'''differences'''</span> between traditional ratemaking ''(including actuarial judgment)'' and price optimization rating plans
*
+
* <span style="color: blue;">'''required disclosures'''</span> when using price optimization rating plans
 +
* ASOP ratemaking principles with respect to price optimization rating plans ''(rates can't be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory)''
  
 
: {| class="wikitable" style="width: 1000px;"
 
: {| class="wikitable" style="width: 1000px;"
 
|-
 
|-
! style="width: 175px;" | reference !! part (a) !! part (b) !! part (c) !! part (d)
+
! style="width: 175px;" | reference !! style="width: 175px;" | part (a) !! style="width: 175px;" | part (b) !! style="width: 175px;" | part (c) !! part (d)
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(01).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2018.Fall #1)'''</span>
 +
|| <span style="color: green;">'''differences:'''</span> <br> - price opt. vs traditional
 +
|| <span style="color: blue;">'''required disclosures:'''</span> <br> - in price opt. plan
 +
|| '''ASOP compliance''': <br> - with price opt. rating
 +
|| '''ASOP violation''': <br> - by price opt. rating
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(01).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2018.Spring #1)'''</span>
 
| [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(01).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2018.Spring #1)'''</span>
||
+
|| <span style="color: green;">'''differences:'''</span> <br> - price opt. vs traditional
||
+
|| '''unfairly discriminatory''': <br> - price opt. data
||
+
|| '''regulator contraints''': <br> - in price opt. plan
|-
+
|| <span style="color: blue;">'''required disclosures:'''</span> <br> - in price opt. plan
| [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_2-Fall)/(2017_2-Fall)_(04).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2017.Fall #4)'''</span>
 
|| --
 
|| --
 
|| --
 
|| rate regulation: regulator's perspective (also in [[Porter.3-Roles-Fed]] for now)
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
Line 33: Line 40:
 
==In Plain English!==
 
==In Plain English!==
  
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
+
This reading is organized into 8 sections with numbered paragraphs in each section as indicated below. Some paragraphs are important and others are not. If I don't explicitly mention a paragraph, it means I've judged that paragraph as not important for the purposes of the exam. It's a good idea for you to glance through the source reading yourself in case you spot something you think I missed.
 +
 
 +
===Section 1: Scope===
 +
 
 +
The ''Scope'' covers paragraphs <u>1-3</u>.
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 2'''</span>
 +
:* The primary focus of this reading is personal lines ratemaking.
 +
 
 +
===Section 2: Introduction===
 +
 
 +
The ''Introduction'' covers paragraphs <u>4-10</u>.
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 5'''</span>
 +
:* Traditionally, actuarial adjustments to indicated rates were judgmental and applied only on a broad level ''(territory for example)''
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 6'''</span>
 +
:* More recently, <u>price optimization</u> techniques have made possible '''granular adjustments''' to indicated rates.
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': how does <u>price optimization</u> compare to traditional ratemaking techniques
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* price optimization is a process that uses
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - big data ''(data mining of insurance & non-insurance personal information where permitted by law)''
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - advanced statistical modeling
 +
::* price optimization makes granular adjustments to indicated rates ''(specific risk classifications, or even individual insureds)''
 +
 
 +
:* We'll return to the topic of ''traditional ratemaking'' versus ''price optimization'' in more detail later. This paragraph was just to give you the general idea.
 +
 
 +
===Section 3: State Rating Law, Actuarial Principles and Definitions===
 +
 
 +
''State Rating Law, Actuarial Principles and Definitions'' covers paragraphs <u>11-14</u>.
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 14a'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''' define <u>price optimization</u> as it is used in this reading
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* the process of maximizing or minimizing a business metric
 +
::* uses sophisticated tools and models to quantify business considerations
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 14d'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''' define <u>cost-based</u> rate
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* this is just the traditional actuarially derived rate based on loss costs, LAE, and other expenses
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 14f'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''' define <u>price elasticity of demand</u>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* the <u>change</u> in quantity demanded versus the price
 +
:::* high elasticity ==> consumers will shop around even if prices only go up a little ''(savvy consumers!)''
 +
:::* low elasticity ==> price doesn't have much effect on demand ''(you can jack the prices but consumers won't shop around)''
 +
 
 +
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=1<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 1]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
 +
 
 +
===Section 4: Price Optimization Background===
 +
 
 +
''Price Optimization Background'' covers paragraphs <u>15-30</u>.
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 19'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': define the terms <u>ratebook</u> optimization, <u>individual price</u> optimization, <u>hybrid</u> optimization
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* ratebook optimization
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; &rarr; <u>adjust</u> factors in a '''cost-based''' rating structure using a '''demand''' model
 +
 
 +
::* individual price optimization
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; &rarr; <u>build</u> a pricing structure based on both '''cost''' and '''demand'''
 +
 
 +
::* hybrid optimization
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; &rarr; <u>insert</u> a new rate factor based on '''demand''' ''(into an existing rate '''cost-based''' structure)''
 +
 
 +
:* These definitions highlight the critical concepts of traditional or '''cost-based''' pricing, and the '''demand''' model of price optimization. If there is only 1 thing you remember from this reading, that's the thing! ''(Price optimization can be based on metrics other than demand but the demand model is one that's very often used so that's my own personal hook for understanding it.)''
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 23'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': define <u>constrained</u> optimization
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* setting <u>minimum</u> & <u>maximum</u> limits on a model's output ''(Ex: current price and cost-based indication)''
 +
::* note that ''unconstrained'' optimization does not impose these limits
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraphs 25-30'''</span>
 +
 
 +
:* These paragraphs seem overly detailed and I think they can be summarized as follows:
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': describe the main <u>differences</u> between traditional ratemaking and price optimization
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::: '''difference 1''':
 +
:::: <span style="color: red;><strong>traditional:</strong></span> applied at class level
 +
:::: <span style="color: green;><strong>price optimized:</strong></span> can be applied to individual policies
 +
::: '''difference 2''':
 +
:::: <span style="color: red;><strong>traditional:</strong></span> used cost-based pricing
 +
:::: <span style="color: green;><strong>price optimized:</strong></span> incorporates non-cost-based considerations like propensity to shop around ''(shopping around relates to demand)''
 +
::: '''difference 3''':
 +
:::: <span style="color: red;><strong>traditional:</strong></span> deviations from indicated rates are subjective
 +
:::: <span style="color: green;><strong>price optimized:</strong></span> deviations from indicated rates are based on quantitative models
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify other miscellaneous differences between traditional ratemaking and price optimization
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* <span style="color: red;><strong>traditional ratemaking</strong></span> ''(including a component for actuarial judgment)'' will assign the <u>same price</u> to identical risks, but <span style="color: green;><strong>price optimization</strong></span> may assign different prices
 +
::* <span style="color: red;><strong>traditional ratemaking</strong></span> ''(including a component for actuarial judgment)'' is generally <u>accepted</u> by regulators whereas <span style="color: green;><strong>price optimization</strong></span> may not be acceptable ''(more on this later)''
 +
 
 +
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=2<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 2]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
 +
 
 +
===Section 5: Identify Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Price Optimization===
 +
 
 +
''Identify Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Price Optimization'' covers paragraphs <u>31-38</u>.
 +
 
 +
:{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify benefits and drawbacks of price optimization
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: green;">'''<u>BENEFITS</u>'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 35'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - doesn't unfairly discriminate ''(low-income customers are <u>more</u> likely to shop around)''
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - provides more accurate pricing ''(neither inadequate nor excessive)''
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 37'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - if optimization is applied on a ratebook level, it is <u>not</u> unfairly discriminatory
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - note that individual optimization ''may'' be unfairly discriminatory
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: red;">'''<u>DRAWBACKS</u>'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 31'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - regulators don't have the data to independently verify rates based on price optimization
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 32'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - the models ''(often GLMs)'' can produce large individual rate swings ''(can be controlled by using <u>constrainted</u> optimization)''
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 34'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - no evidence of improved stability from using price optimization ''(effect on long-term costs is inconclusive)''
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 38'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; - concern that ratemaing ASOPs may be violated ''(if rates are unfairly discriminatory)''
 +
 
 +
:{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Ratemaking ASOP Review Question''': identify 3 things that a rate filing '''cannot''' be
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 39'''</span>
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; -  a rate filing '''cannot''' be: ''inadequate, excessive, unfairly discriminatory
 +
 
 +
===Section 6: Regulatory Responses to Price Optimized Rating Schemes===
 +
 
 +
''Regulatory Responses to Price Optimized Rating Schemes'' covers paragraphs <u>39-42</u>.
 +
 
 +
{| class='wikitable' style="background-color: pink;"
 +
|-
 +
| This sections has many '''bullet points list''' - a favorite type of exam question - but its impossible to know which ones might be asked. :-(
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 42'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify possible regulatory responses to price optimization rating plans
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 42a'''</span>
 +
::* determine <u>permissibility</u> with respect to state laws
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 42b'''</span>
 +
::* define regulatory <u>constraints</u> ''(min/max rate swings, methods apply only to rate classes of at least a certain size)''
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 42f'''</span>
 +
::* transparency: require <u>full explanation</u> of...
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; ==> DAM - Data / Methods / Assumptions
 +
::: &nbsp;&nbsp; ==> rate differences between customers with identical risk profiles ''(if any)''
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 42(d) & 42(f)'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify <u>disclosures</u> a regulator may require when price optimization is used in a rate filing
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* rate adjustments that are not cost-based
 +
::* <u>whether</u> price optimization was used ''(Ex: demand models)''
 +
::* <u>which</u> rating factors are affected by price optimization and their quantitative impact
 +
::* <u>whether</u> customers with the same risk profile have different rates
 +
::* data sources and models that affected the rate charged in any way
 +
 
 +
:: <span style="color: red;">==></span> I found these by using '''cntrl-f''' in the source reading to search for the word ''disclosure''.
 +
 
 +
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=3<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 3]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
 +
 
 +
===Section 7: Recommendations for Regulators===
 +
 
 +
''Recommendations for Regulators'' covers paragraphs <u>43-49</u>.
 +
 
 +
: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraphs 45-46'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify <u>recommendations</u> of the Task Force on Price Optimization '''regarding pricing methodology'''
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* rates should be cost-based
 +
::* rates should comply with state law
 +
::* customers with identical risk profiles should be charged the same rate ''(aside from temporary differences - due to transition rules for example)''
 +
 
 +
: <span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 48'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify rating practices or considerations that the Task Force on Price Optimization believes are <u>unfairly discriminatory</u>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* price elasticity of demand
 +
::* propensity to shop for insurance
 +
::* retention adjustment at an individual level
 +
::* a policyholder's propensity to ask questions or file complaints
 +
 
 +
===Section 8: State Considerations===
 +
 
 +
''State Considerations'' covers paragraph <u>50</u>.
 +
 
 +
:<span style="color: green;">'''paragraph 50'''</span>
 +
 
 +
::{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| '''Question''': identify <u>recommendations</u> of the Task Force on Price Optimization '''regarding state regulatory practices'''
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
::* <u>issue</u> bulletin addressing use of non-cost-based methods
 +
::* <u>enhance</u> disclosure requirements for rate filings
 +
::* <u>ensure</u> compliance with state laws and actuarial principles by analyzing insurers' rating models
 +
 
 +
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=4<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 4]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
 +
 
 +
===Extra Exam Problems===
 +
 
 +
Here's a final quiz with some exam problems that weren't covered by earlier quizzes.
  
 +
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=5<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 5]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>
  
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS==
+
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=Price&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span>

Revision as of 01:10, 3 April 2019

This reading, Price Optimization White Paper, provides background research on price optimization, identifies potential benefits and drawbacks to the use of price optimization, and presents options for state regulatory responses regarding the use of price optimization in ratemaking.

  Forum

Study Tips

Since this is a relatively new reading, we don't have a lot of old exam problems to help us determine what the CAS deems important. Unfortunately, that means we'll have to spend more time on this reading, possibly learning things that are of relatively little importance, but we'll use judgment to try to minimize wasted time. As more exam problems on the topic appear, we'll be able to cull the material that needs to be studied. I'd plan for 2 hours on this reading (not including subsequent review time.)

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • differences between traditional ratemaking (including actuarial judgment) and price optimization rating plans
  • required disclosures when using price optimization rating plans
  • ASOP ratemaking principles with respect to price optimization rating plans (rates can't be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory)
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2018.Fall #1) differences:
- price opt. vs traditional
required disclosures:
- in price opt. plan
ASOP compliance:
- with price opt. rating
ASOP violation:
- by price opt. rating
E (2018.Spring #1) differences:
- price opt. vs traditional
unfairly discriminatory:
- price opt. data
regulator contraints:
- in price opt. plan
required disclosures:
- in price opt. plan

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.

  Forum

In Plain English!

This reading is organized into 8 sections with numbered paragraphs in each section as indicated below. Some paragraphs are important and others are not. If I don't explicitly mention a paragraph, it means I've judged that paragraph as not important for the purposes of the exam. It's a good idea for you to glance through the source reading yourself in case you spot something you think I missed.

Section 1: Scope

The Scope covers paragraphs 1-3.

paragraph 2
  • The primary focus of this reading is personal lines ratemaking.

Section 2: Introduction

The Introduction covers paragraphs 4-10.

paragraph 5
  • Traditionally, actuarial adjustments to indicated rates were judgmental and applied only on a broad level (territory for example)
paragraph 6
  • More recently, price optimization techniques have made possible granular adjustments to indicated rates.
Question: how does price optimization compare to traditional ratemaking techniques
  • price optimization is a process that uses
   - big data (data mining of insurance & non-insurance personal information where permitted by law)
   - advanced statistical modeling
  • price optimization makes granular adjustments to indicated rates (specific risk classifications, or even individual insureds)
  • We'll return to the topic of traditional ratemaking versus price optimization in more detail later. This paragraph was just to give you the general idea.

Section 3: State Rating Law, Actuarial Principles and Definitions

State Rating Law, Actuarial Principles and Definitions covers paragraphs 11-14.

paragraph 14a
Question define price optimization as it is used in this reading
  • the process of maximizing or minimizing a business metric
  • uses sophisticated tools and models to quantify business considerations
paragraph 14d
Question define cost-based rate
  • this is just the traditional actuarially derived rate based on loss costs, LAE, and other expenses
paragraph 14f
Question define price elasticity of demand
  • the change in quantity demanded versus the price
  • high elasticity ==> consumers will shop around even if prices only go up a little (savvy consumers!)
  • low elasticity ==> price doesn't have much effect on demand (you can jack the prices but consumers won't shop around)

mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Section 4: Price Optimization Background

Price Optimization Background covers paragraphs 15-30.

paragraph 19
Question: define the terms ratebook optimization, individual price optimization, hybrid optimization
  • ratebook optimization
   → adjust factors in a cost-based rating structure using a demand model
  • individual price optimization
   → build a pricing structure based on both cost and demand
  • hybrid optimization
   → insert a new rate factor based on demand (into an existing rate cost-based structure)
  • These definitions highlight the critical concepts of traditional or cost-based pricing, and the demand model of price optimization. If there is only 1 thing you remember from this reading, that's the thing! (Price optimization can be based on metrics other than demand but the demand model is one that's very often used so that's my own personal hook for understanding it.)
paragraph 23
Question: define constrained optimization
  • setting minimum & maximum limits on a model's output (Ex: current price and cost-based indication)
  • note that unconstrained optimization does not impose these limits
paragraphs 25-30
  • These paragraphs seem overly detailed and I think they can be summarized as follows:
Question: describe the main differences between traditional ratemaking and price optimization
difference 1:
traditional: applied at class level
price optimized: can be applied to individual policies
difference 2:
traditional: used cost-based pricing
price optimized: incorporates non-cost-based considerations like propensity to shop around (shopping around relates to demand)
difference 3:
traditional: deviations from indicated rates are subjective
price optimized: deviations from indicated rates are based on quantitative models
Question: identify other miscellaneous differences between traditional ratemaking and price optimization
  • traditional ratemaking (including a component for actuarial judgment) will assign the same price to identical risks, but price optimization may assign different prices
  • traditional ratemaking (including a component for actuarial judgment) is generally accepted by regulators whereas price optimization may not be acceptable (more on this later)

mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Section 5: Identify Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Price Optimization

Identify Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Price Optimization covers paragraphs 31-38.

Question: identify benefits and drawbacks of price optimization
BENEFITS
paragraph 35
   - doesn't unfairly discriminate (low-income customers are more likely to shop around)
   - provides more accurate pricing (neither inadequate nor excessive)
paragraph 37
   - if optimization is applied on a ratebook level, it is not unfairly discriminatory
   - note that individual optimization may be unfairly discriminatory
DRAWBACKS
paragraph 31
   - regulators don't have the data to independently verify rates based on price optimization
paragraph 32
   - the models (often GLMs) can produce large individual rate swings (can be controlled by using constrainted optimization)
paragraph 34
   - no evidence of improved stability from using price optimization (effect on long-term costs is inconclusive)
paragraph 38
   - concern that ratemaing ASOPs may be violated (if rates are unfairly discriminatory)
Ratemaking ASOP Review Question: identify 3 things that a rate filing cannot be
paragraph 39
   - a rate filing cannot be: inadequate, excessive, unfairly discriminatory

Section 6: Regulatory Responses to Price Optimized Rating Schemes

Regulatory Responses to Price Optimized Rating Schemes covers paragraphs 39-42.

This sections has many bullet points list - a favorite type of exam question - but its impossible to know which ones might be asked. :-(
paragraph 42
Question: identify possible regulatory responses to price optimization rating plans
paragraph 42a
  • determine permissibility with respect to state laws
paragraph 42b
  • define regulatory constraints (min/max rate swings, methods apply only to rate classes of at least a certain size)
paragraph 42f
  • transparency: require full explanation of...
   ==> DAM - Data / Methods / Assumptions
   ==> rate differences between customers with identical risk profiles (if any)
paragraph 42(d) & 42(f)
Question: identify disclosures a regulator may require when price optimization is used in a rate filing
  • rate adjustments that are not cost-based
  • whether price optimization was used (Ex: demand models)
  • which rating factors are affected by price optimization and their quantitative impact
  • whether customers with the same risk profile have different rates
  • data sources and models that affected the rate charged in any way
==> I found these by using cntrl-f in the source reading to search for the word disclosure.

mini BattleQuiz 3 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Section 7: Recommendations for Regulators

Recommendations for Regulators covers paragraphs 43-49.

paragraphs 45-46
Question: identify recommendations of the Task Force on Price Optimization regarding pricing methodology
  • rates should be cost-based
  • rates should comply with state law
  • customers with identical risk profiles should be charged the same rate (aside from temporary differences - due to transition rules for example)
paragraph 48
Question: identify rating practices or considerations that the Task Force on Price Optimization believes are unfairly discriminatory
  • price elasticity of demand
  • propensity to shop for insurance
  • retention adjustment at an individual level
  • a policyholder's propensity to ask questions or file complaints

Section 8: State Considerations

State Considerations covers paragraph 50.

paragraph 50
Question: identify recommendations of the Task Force on Price Optimization regarding state regulatory practices
  • issue bulletin addressing use of non-cost-based methods
  • enhance disclosure requirements for rate filings
  • ensure compliance with state laws and actuarial principles by analyzing insurers' rating models

mini BattleQuiz 4 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Extra Exam Problems

Here's a final quiz with some exam problems that weren't covered by earlier quizzes.

mini BattleQuiz 5 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.