Difference between revisions of "Bright Line Indicator Test"

From BattleActs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
: Suppose the AA did not address material adverse deviation and that:
 
: Suppose the AA did not address material adverse deviation and that:
  
:: '''net L & LAE reserves''' = 500
+
:: '''net L & LAE reserves''' = 500 &nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color: green;">&larr; ''from Liabilities, Surplus and Other Funds, '''(Line 1) + (Line 3)'''''</span>
:: '''TAC''' = 600
+
:: '''TAC''' = 600 &nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color: green;">&larr; ''from Five-Year Historical Data, '''Line 28'''''</span>
:: '''ACL''' = 280
+
:: '''ACL''' = 280 &nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color: green;">&larr; ''from Five-Year Historical Data, '''Line 29'''''</span>
  
 
: Then:
 
: Then:

Latest revision as of 20:08, 1 July 2023

The Bright Line Indicator Test is mentioned in COPLFR.SAO - Step 6B as part of the SAO but it requires knowledge of Odomirok.19-RBC, specifically Alice's 1st Day. That section will only take a few minutes to read so you should do that before proceeding.

Note:

  • TAC = Total Adjusted Capital (this is an RBC concept and refers to the balance sheet capital available to a company)
  • ACL = regulatory capital level corresponding to Authorized Control Level
  • CAL = regulatory capital level corresponding to Company Action Level = 2 x ACL
Question: what is the Bright Line Indicator Test
IF
[1] the AA does not address material adverse deviation
[2] 10% x (net L & LAE reserves)   >   TAC – CAL
THEN
the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA

Example:

Suppose the AA did not address material adverse deviation and that:
net L & LAE reserves = 500   from Liabilities, Surplus and Other Funds, (Line 1) + (Line 3)
TAC = 600   from Five-Year Historical Data, Line 28
ACL = 280   from Five-Year Historical Data, Line 29
Then:
10% x (net L & LAE reserves) = 10% x 500 = 50   >   40 = (600 – 560) = (TAC – CAL) = (TAC – 2 x ACL)
Therefore, the financial analyst should pursue comments from the AA regarding material adverse deviation.

Here are 2 old exam problems regarding the Bright Line Indicator Test:

E (2019.Spring #19)
E (2016.Fall #20)