Difference between revisions of "NAIC.SSAP-5R"
(→A Few More Facts) |
|||
| (53 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''Reading''': Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles 5R, “'''Liabilities, Contingencies and Impairment of Assets''',” paragraphs 1-12, 30-33, and 37-38 | |
| − | + | '''Author''': National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual | |
| + | |||
| + | [https://battleacts.discourse.group/c/candidates-6u/naic-ssap-5r/223<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>] | ||
| + | [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/vanillaforum6us/categories/naic-ssap-5r '' (Or click here for Legacy Forum – no longer monitored)''</span>] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <span style="display: inline-block; background-color: blue; color: white; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; line-height: 50px; width: 50px; height: 50px; border-radius: 50%;">VIDEO</span> → | ||
| + | [https://battleacts8.ca/6u/video/500_Impairment_(v01).mp4 <span style="color: black; font-size: 12px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 2px; border-radius: 10px; border-color: aqua; padding: 5px 10px 5px 10px; margin-top: 100px;">'''(4:15) → Impairment - General Overview'''</span>] | ||
| + | ([[Videos |Click here for all currently available videos.]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class='wikitable' style='background-color: navajowhite; | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || '''BA Quick-Summary''': <span style="color: green;>'''Accounting Principles - Liabilities, Contingencies and Impairment of Assets'''</span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Paragraphs 1 - 12''': | ||
| + | * This section defines statutory accounting principles for liabilities, contingencies, and impairments of assets. A '''liability''' is characterized by a present duty to transfer assets or provide services due to past transactions, and it must be recorded in financial statements when incurred. For joint and several liabilities, the total obligation should be reported as the sum of agreed payments and any additional expected amounts, while '''loss contingencies''' and '''impairments''' must be recorded if the loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Paragraphs 30 - 33''': | ||
| + | * This section mandates '''disclosures''' for joint and several liability arrangements, loss contingencies, and guarantees, even if the possibility of loss is remote. These disclosures must include the nature, terms, amounts, and potential recoveries related to these liabilities to ensure transparency in financial statements. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Paragraphs 37 - 38''': | ||
| + | * This very short section mentions the requirement for financial statements to '''disclose the nature of any gain contingency''' while avoiding misleading implications about the likelihood of realization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
==Study Tips== | ==Study Tips== | ||
| − | This is a reading where your best strategy is to play the odds. In other words, skip it unless you've already learned the | + | The year of publication for the manual changes each year but the content generally does not. We will let you know if there is a major change. |
| + | |||
| + | * <span style="color: red;">'''2022-Fall:'''</span> There was 1 very minor update that is noted further down. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is a reading where your best strategy is to play the odds. In other words, skip it unless you've already learned the high-ranked readings very, very well. It contains definitions for several terms that ''<u>seem</u>'' important, but none has ever been asked. If I were studying for this exam, I would blow it off. Worst case scenario: there's a 1.0-point question and you take an educated guess. | ||
==BattleTable== | ==BattleTable== | ||
| − | * ''this reading has not been tested on any exam from the year 2012 | + | * ''this reading has not been tested on any exam from the year 2012 to Fall 2019 when the exams stopped being published.'' |
: {| class="wikitable" style="width: 1000px;" | : {| class="wikitable" style="width: 1000px;" | ||
| Line 26: | Line 52: | ||
==In Plain English!== | ==In Plain English!== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Basic Facts === | ||
{| class='wikitable' | {| class='wikitable' | ||
| Line 41: | Line 69: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | * a '''condition''' involving uncertainty | + | * a '''condition''' involving uncertainty as to a possible loss |
* resolved when future event occurs ''or'' fails to occur | * resolved when future event occurs ''or'' fails to occur | ||
* '''levels''': | * '''levels''': | ||
| Line 47: | Line 75: | ||
: - reasonably possible ''(between probably and remote)'' | : - reasonably possible ''(between probably and remote)'' | ||
: - remote ''(slight chance of occurring)'' | : - remote ''(slight chance of occurring)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| class='wikitable' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || '''Side Note''': The above comments apply to both a <span style="color: red;">loss contingency</span> and an <span style="color: red;">asset impairment</span> but those 2 terms are not quite the same thing: | ||
| + | * Loss contingency = “I might owe.” ''(and shows up on the '''liability side''' of the balance sheet)'' | ||
| + | * Asset impairment = “This asset isn’t worth what I booked.” ''(and shows up on the '''asset side''' of the balance sheet)'' | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class='wikitable' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''Question <span style="color: red;">(new for 2022-Fall)</span>''': if a financial instrument has characteristics of '''both''' <u>liabilities</u> and <u>equity</u> then how should it be reported in financial statements | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | * as a '''liability''', to the extent the instrument embodies an unconditional obligation of the issuer | ||
That's about it. Here's the quiz... | That's about it. Here's the quiz... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=SSAP-5R§ion=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Lower Probability Exam Items === | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you want to go into a little more depth in this article, Ian-the-Intern pulled out 5 exam-type questions from various paragraphs within the reading. You should only cover these if you've already studied all the high-value topics thoroughly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * These 5 questions are ranked in order of importance (according to Ian!) | ||
| + | |||
| + | These questions and answers <u>aren’t included in the BattleCards</u> because they’re unlikely to appear on the exam, and including them might suggest they’re required study. Think of them as optional extras rather than core material. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! '''Paragraph(s)''' | ||
| + | ! '''Exam-Type Question''' | ||
| + | ! '''Answer''' | ||
| + | ! '''Comment / Why It Matters''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''12''' | ||
| + | | If a loss contingency is probable and reasonably estimable <span style="background-color: navajowhite;">as a range</span>, but no amount within the range is a better estimate than another, what amount should be accrued? | ||
| + | | Accrue the '''midpoint (mean)''' of the estimated range. If the high end of the range cannot be quantified, then no range exists and management’s '''best estimate''' is used. | ||
| + | | Very testable measurement rule. Easy to miss under pressure. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''11''' | ||
| + | | When is a judgment considered <span style="background-color: thistle;">“rendered”</span> for purposes of recognizing a liability, and do appeals affect recognition? | ||
| + | | A judgment is rendered when the '''court enters a verdict'''. The ability to appeal does '''not''' delay accrual. The liability includes anticipated settlement amounts, legal costs, and related recoveries. | ||
| + | | Creates an automatic presumption of accrual. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''32''' | ||
| + | | When must a loss contingency be <span style="background-color: navajowhite;">disclosed</span> even if it is not accrued, and what must be disclosed? | ||
| + | | Disclosure is required when there is at least a '''reasonable possibility''' of loss. The disclosure must describe the '''nature''' of the contingency and provide an '''estimate of the loss or range''', or state that it cannot be estimated. | ||
| + | | Tests recognition vs disclosure distinction. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''5–6''' | ||
| + | | How should a reporting entity measure its obligation under a <span style="background-color: thistle;">joint and several liability</span> arrangement when the total obligation is fixed but payments for co-obligors are uncertain? | ||
| + | | Record the sum of (1) the entity’s agreed share and (2) any additional amount it '''expects to pay on behalf of co-obligors''', using the best estimate or midpoint if no estimate is better. | ||
| + | | Measurement detail for Joint & Several Liability. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''38''' | ||
| + | | How should <span style="background-color: navajowhite;">gain contingencies</span> be treated in statutory financial statements? | ||
| + | | Gain contingencies are '''not accrued'''. The nature may be disclosed, but care must be taken to avoid misleading implications about the likelihood of realization. | ||
| + | | Low probability topic, but easy points if tested. | ||
| + | |} | ||
[https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=SSAP-5R§ion=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span> | [https://www.battleacts6us.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=NAIC&suffix=SSAP-5R§ion=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:18, 22 January 2026
Reading: Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles 5R, “Liabilities, Contingencies and Impairment of Assets,” paragraphs 1-12, 30-33, and 37-38
Author: National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual
Forum (Or click here for Legacy Forum – no longer monitored)
VIDEO → (4:15) → Impairment - General Overview (Click here for all currently available videos.)
| BA Quick-Summary: Accounting Principles - Liabilities, Contingencies and Impairment of Assets
Paragraphs 1 - 12:
Paragraphs 30 - 33:
Paragraphs 37 - 38:
|
Contents
Study Tips
The year of publication for the manual changes each year but the content generally does not. We will let you know if there is a major change.
- 2022-Fall: There was 1 very minor update that is noted further down.
This is a reading where your best strategy is to play the odds. In other words, skip it unless you've already learned the high-ranked readings very, very well. It contains definitions for several terms that seem important, but none has ever been asked. If I were studying for this exam, I would blow it off. Worst case scenario: there's a 1.0-point question and you take an educated guess.
BattleTable
- this reading has not been tested on any exam from the year 2012 to Fall 2019 when the exams stopped being published.
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) no prior questions
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
In Plain English!
Basic Facts
| Question: identify the components of a liability |
- responsibility to transfer assets upon occurrence of a specified event
- responsibility cannot be avoided
- event has occurred
| Question: define loss contingency or asset impairment and identify the 3 levels |
- a condition involving uncertainty as to a possible loss
- resolved when future event occurs or fails to occur
- levels:
- - probable (likely to occur)
- - reasonably possible (between probably and remote)
- - remote (slight chance of occurring)
Side Note: The above comments apply to both a loss contingency and an asset impairment but those 2 terms are not quite the same thing: - Loss contingency = “I might owe.” (and shows up on the liability side of the balance sheet)
- Asset impairment = “This asset isn’t worth what I booked.” (and shows up on the asset side of the balance sheet)
| Question (new for 2022-Fall): if a financial instrument has characteristics of both liabilities and equity then how should it be reported in financial statements |
- as a liability, to the extent the instrument embodies an unconditional obligation of the issuer
That's about it. Here's the quiz...
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
Lower Probability Exam Items
If you want to go into a little more depth in this article, Ian-the-Intern pulled out 5 exam-type questions from various paragraphs within the reading. You should only cover these if you've already studied all the high-value topics thoroughly.
- These 5 questions are ranked in order of importance (according to Ian!)
These questions and answers aren’t included in the BattleCards because they’re unlikely to appear on the exam, and including them might suggest they’re required study. Think of them as optional extras rather than core material.
| Paragraph(s) | Exam-Type Question | Answer | Comment / Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | If a loss contingency is probable and reasonably estimable as a range, but no amount within the range is a better estimate than another, what amount should be accrued? | Accrue the midpoint (mean) of the estimated range. If the high end of the range cannot be quantified, then no range exists and management’s best estimate is used. | Very testable measurement rule. Easy to miss under pressure. |
| 11 | When is a judgment considered “rendered” for purposes of recognizing a liability, and do appeals affect recognition? | A judgment is rendered when the court enters a verdict. The ability to appeal does not delay accrual. The liability includes anticipated settlement amounts, legal costs, and related recoveries. | Creates an automatic presumption of accrual. |
| 32 | When must a loss contingency be disclosed even if it is not accrued, and what must be disclosed? | Disclosure is required when there is at least a reasonable possibility of loss. The disclosure must describe the nature of the contingency and provide an estimate of the loss or range, or state that it cannot be estimated. | Tests recognition vs disclosure distinction. |
| 5–6 | How should a reporting entity measure its obligation under a joint and several liability arrangement when the total obligation is fixed but payments for co-obligors are uncertain? | Record the sum of (1) the entity’s agreed share and (2) any additional amount it expects to pay on behalf of co-obligors, using the best estimate or midpoint if no estimate is better. | Measurement detail for Joint & Several Liability. |
| 38 | How should gain contingencies be treated in statutory financial statements? | Gain contingencies are not accrued. The nature may be disclosed, but care must be taken to avoid misleading implications about the likelihood of realization. | Low probability topic, but easy points if tested. |
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.