BattleActs Exam 6-US
  • Discussions
  • Activity
  • BattlePlan
  • BattleBriefings
Home › Search
Sign In · Register

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register
  1. Is the 10-10 Rule supposed to net out the RI premium when computing the loss?

    amberxmc
    by amberxmc · September 11
    I am confused, please help. Should I subtract RE premium or not? and what's the threshold in S15 #25a?
  2. #21 outdated? Dividend Income

    Wolverine
    by Wolverine · September 3
    Maybe I'm just too new here to not recognize an AMIT problem... I didn't see this covered in the wiki.
  3. 2018 Q26 A

    danwang0509
    by danwang0509 · August 9
    I am confused with this problem and Spring 2016 #26. Should we subtract premium for 10-10 method?
  4. Fall 2019, #25

    aklamon1
    by aklamon1 · July 31
    Is this the distinction between the two sets of disclosure items in the SCOPE section of the SAO?
  5. Spring 2016 #26b - Reinsurance Recoverable RBC Charge Factor Question

    nkekar
    by nkekar · July 12
    There is a 0.10 RBC Charge factor to the reinsurance recoverables for R3, but a 1.00 RBC charge factor to the reinsurance recoverable for R4 portion. Is this correct way of thinking about this?
  6. #25a: 10-10 rule

    nathankan353
    by nathankan353 · July 9
    In 25a, why is there only a 5% of reinsurer incurring a loss? If the reinsurer is paying "all ceded losses in entirety", wouldn't a 5M claim be >10% U/W loss too? Thanks!
  7. 2018 - Fall 3b)

    nkekar
    by nkekar · June 22
    I would've assumed that the answers would be #1 allow states to regulate rates and #2 promote equitable rates would be acceptable answer under the notes but the answers under the quiz review and exami
  8. #S2016 #25 b - Annual Statement

    nkekar
    by nkekar · May 30
    What are all of the Exhibits that are incorporated in the Annual Statement?
  9. Spring 2017 #26

    nkekar
    by nkekar · May 21
    I'm looking through the examiner's report and I do not understand the following line:
  10. 2016.Spring 17 c.

    nkekar
    by nkekar · May 17
    Sorry I mentioned it was Rank 4 - IRIS, not IRIS 4. I should've been more clear. This pertains to NII - IRIS 6. It is problem #22 in the Rank 4 section of IRIS problems.
  11. 2016.Spring 17 c.

    nkekar
    by nkekar · May 13
    study false information. (Rank 4 IRIS- problem #22)
  12. #20

    michael7
    by michael7 · April 21
    In this problem, despite payments being made at mid-year the durations in the sample answer are 1, 2 and 3. Yet, for 2015.Fall #19 a similar comment is made of payments being made mid-year and the d…
  13. Spring 2019 #2c

    mayminyi
    by mayminyi · April 17
    The examiner's report stated that the list below are variations of the unique response: Buyers are sophisticated
  14. 2019 Fall 7

    graham
    by graham · April 16
    * https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/Exam_Summaries#2019_Fall
  15. #28

    michael7
    by michael7 · April 16
    For part B,
  16. #27 (b)

    tilly610
    by tilly610 · April 12
    One of the flashcards under NAIC.SSAP-62R mentioned that under prospective reinsurance accounting, loss reserves increase when there is a claim but this problem's answer mentions loss reserves decrea…
  17. Spring 2015 #25

    jjacks12
    by jjacks12 · April 2
    The excel version of the titled exam/question has an error - the gross insured loss amount for Option1/Hurricane should be 100M
  18. #25: ERD calculation

    marodriguez
    by marodriguez · March 25
    For part a ii):
  19. Mini Battle Quiz 3, Battle Card 2 on 2017.Fall #21

    DBrads409
    by DBrads409 · March 19
    Maybe an indicator should be put on this BattleCard to indicate that the solution in the examiner's report is no longer valid because of the dividend portion of the calculation and AMIT/AMTI. Also, m…
  20. Mini Battle Quiz 3, Battle Card 2 on 2017.Fall #21

    DBrads409
    by DBrads409 · March 19
    Maybe an indicator should be put on this BattleCard to indicate that the solution in the examiner's report is no longer valid because of the dividend portion of the calculation and AMIT/AMTI. Also, m…
Next
Forum Software Powered by Vanilla