-
2016.Spring #26 a.)
by AdamDougall ·I interpreted the table as there is a: -
Spring 2016 #20
by amberxmc ·for a. i. why can't I say other actuary's qualification but can ****Disclose the affiliation of the other actuary****? -
Amounts recoverable from reinsurers
by graham ·* https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/Odomirok.14-F#2018.Spring_.239_.28essay.29 -
Materiality Standard (2016.Spring #24) - part (a)
by aggarw16 ·How do we get the 3rd materiality standard and what does company action level mean ? -
2017 Fall #25 c
by lkto22 ·Hi for c is "relevant comment - reinsurance collectability" a legit answer? I am not seeing it either your or CAS' solution. Thank you for the help. -
Fall 2015 #22
by lkto22 ·Hi for part a), In Opinion C, I thought key word "inadequate" should be used, instead of "are less than the min amt...", but solution didn't mention it at all. Do I have a point? … -
Porter 8 - 19S#2
by lkto22 ·Hi for b) is solution's format must be followed? For instance, compulsory and high voter interest only count as one solution? Thank you -
19 Fall #23
by lkto22 ·Hi for c) can bright-line test be used here? If not, what are the possible reasons? Thank you. -
Fall 2012 Q 29
by lkto22 ·Hi Graham, in F14#23a, per the solution, is excluding the UEPR for Long Duration Contracts a correct option for this problem too? Thank you -
spring 2015 #13
by mec06e ·like we did in Fall 2012 #2 for Total Profit -
Spring 2015 #25c
by zachboaz ·The R5 RBC factor looks to be calculated as CxA+A-1, but it should really be CxA+U-1. We aren't give U in this problem though, so do you just substitute A for U if you don't have U? -
Review Date in SCOPE
by graham ·* https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/BattleTables_-_COPLFR#2018_Exam_Questions -
Review Date in SCOPE
by zachboaz ·Is the review date typically just 12/31 of the year for which the SAO is being written? In Fall 2018 #23b, a common error was listed as "paragraph 2 should state the actual date through which inf -
Modeled Spring 2017 #19
by zachboaz ·For the modeled version of this (#29 in the Full BattleQuiz), if the actional level was Company Action Level & the COR was > 120%, would the high range of the PH Surplus be the amount t -
Fall 2017 #22
by zachboaz ·When we are giving our opinion, do we give 2 individual opinions on both net & gross and leave it at that? Or do we state (for this example) that net reserves are reasonable, gross reserves a… -
Spring 2018 #24a
by zachboaz ·The examiner's report says the AOS items A, B, and C can be net "and/or" gross, but the wiki says it must be net "and" gross for all items. -
Spring 2018 #20a
by zachboaz ·It says the actuary's range of reasonable estimation of loss and LAE reserve is in the AOS but not in the SAO, would this not be part of the OPINION section? Or for that section do you not have to di… -
Fall 2018 #22a
by zachboaz ·For the Opinion here, why do the examiner's reports make no mention of unearned premium for long-duration contracts? If there is no mention of long-duration contracts do we just assume there aren't a… -
Spring 2016 #22
by JJJ ·For a, is it bc we are not given non-tabular discount/tabular discount, therefore PHS = TAC? -
Tax Benefit Confusion
by zachboaz ·I am getting the BA's version of p_T from BattleActs' re-formatted example of Spring 2016 #27. I also see the examiner's report shows it the same way as BattleActs, it was just confusing me at first t